<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.hlt.inesc-id.pt/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Analysis_of_interrogatives_in_different_domains</id>
	<title>Analysis of interrogatives in different domains - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.hlt.inesc-id.pt/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Analysis_of_interrogatives_in_different_domains"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hlt.inesc-id.pt/wiki/index.php?title=Analysis_of_interrogatives_in_different_domains&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-12T19:48:48Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.hlt.inesc-id.pt/wiki/index.php?title=Analysis_of_interrogatives_in_different_domains&amp;diff=5802&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Acbm at 17:49, 4 May 2010</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hlt.inesc-id.pt/wiki/index.php?title=Analysis_of_interrogatives_in_different_domains&amp;diff=5802&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2010-05-04T17:49:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{infobox|name=Helena Moniz&lt;br /&gt;
|username=helenam&lt;br /&gt;
|contact=helenam&lt;br /&gt;
|phone=+351-213-100-313&lt;br /&gt;
|fax=+351-213-145-843&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Date ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15:00, Friday, May 7&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
* Room 336&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Speaker ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helena Moniz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of our study is twofold: to quantify the distinct interrogative types in different contexts and to discuss the weight of the linguistic features that best describe these structures, in order to model interrogatives in speech. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In European Portuguese, as in other languages, interrogatives may be sub classified in yes-no questions, wh-questions and tags. These distinctions are accompanied by lexico-syntactic and prosodic features. &lt;br /&gt;
Yes-no questions have the same syntactic structure of a declarative and may be differentiated by intonation contours; wh-questions have wh-words which make them recognizable; and tags have also distinctive forms, e.g., declarative sentence + negative particle + verb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State-of-the-art studies on sentence boundary detection and punctuation have discussed the relative weight of the previously mentioned features. &lt;br /&gt;
Shriberg et al. (1998; 2008) report that prosodic features are more significant than lexical ones and that better results are achieved when combining both features; Wang and Narayanan (2004) claim that results based only on prosodic properties are quite robust; Boakye et al. &lt;br /&gt;
(2009), analyzing meetings, state that lexico-syntactic features are the most important ones to identify interrogatives. This raises the following question:  is the weight of the features dependent on the nature of the corpus and on the most characteristic types of interrogative in each?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This study addresses that question, using three distinct corpora for European Portuguese: broadcast news (61h, 449k words), classroom lectures (27h, 155k words), and map-task dialogues (7h, 61k words). &lt;br /&gt;
Results will also be presented for newspaper text (148M words). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Seminars]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Seminars 2010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Acbm</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>