Bottom-Up Parsing/LALR(1) Example 1 - Revision history

Root: Redirected page to ist:Bottom-Up Parsing/LALR(1) Example 1

2018-12-06T18:02:52Z

Redirected page to ist:Bottom-Up Parsing/LALR(1) Example 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 6 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Consider the following grammar.~~		#REDIRECT [[ist:Bottom-Up Parsing/LALR(1) Example 1]]
	~~<text>~~
	A -~~> C x A \| ε~~
	~~B -> x C y \| x C~~
	~~C -> x B x \| z~~
	</~~text>~~

	~~# Build the~~ LALR(1) ~~parser table. If conflicts exist, assume YACC's behavior.~~
	~~# Show the differences to LR(0) and SLR(~~1~~) parsers.~~
	~~# Compact the parse table, eliminating and propagating reductions.~~
	~~# Show the stack and input states, as well as the parser actions, for the sequence '''xxzxx'''.~~

	* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf Solution]<br/>There is a "bug" in this solution: in the compacted table, L3 in state 10 should be in the column corresponding to '''y''' (corresponding to the shift to state 11 in the uncompacted table).

	~~[[category:Compiladores]]~~
	~~[[category:Ensino~~]]

Root at 14:27, 6 April 2015

2015-04-06T14:27:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 6 April 2015
Line 13:		Line 13:
	* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf Solution]<br/>There is a "bug" in this solution: in the compacted table, L3 in state 10 should be in the column corresponding to '''y''' (corresponding to the shift to state 11 in the uncompacted table).		* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf Solution]<br/>There is a "bug" in this solution: in the compacted table, L3 in state 10 should be in the column corresponding to '''y''' (corresponding to the shift to state 11 in the uncompacted table).

	[[category:~~Compilers~~]]		[[category:Compiladores]]
	[[category:~~IST~~]]		[[category:Ensino]]

Root: LALR(1) Example 1 moved to Bottom-Up Parsing/LALR(1) Example 1

2009-05-28T19:35:59Z

LALR(1) Example 1 moved to Bottom-Up Parsing/LALR(1) Example 1

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:35, 28 May 2009
(No difference)

Root at 18:39, 10 January 2009

2009-01-10T18:39:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 10 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Consider the following grammar.		Consider the following grammar.
	<text>		<text>
	A -> C x A \| Îµ		A -> C x A \| ε
	B -> x C y \| x C		B -> x C y \| x C
	C -> x B x \| z		C -> x B x \| z

Root at 12:50, 28 June 2008

2008-06-28T12:50:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 28 June 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:
	# Show the stack and input states, as well as the parser actions, for the sequence '''xxzxx'''.		# Show the stack and input states, as well as the parser actions, for the sequence '''xxzxx'''.

	* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf Solution]		* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf Solution]<br/>There is a "bug" in this solution: in the compacted table, L3 in state 10 should be in the column corresponding to '''y''' (corresponding to the shift to state 11 in the uncompacted table).

	[[category:Compilers]]		[[category:Compilers]]
	[[category:IST]]		[[category:IST]]

Root at 14:37, 6 May 2008

2008-05-06T14:37:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 6 May 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	# Build the LALR(1) parser table. If conflicts exist, assume YACC's behavior.		# Build the LALR(1) parser table. If conflicts exist, assume YACC's behavior.
	# Show the differences to LR(0) and SLR(1) parsers.		# Show the differences to LR(0) and SLR(1) parsers.
	# Compact the parse table, eliminating and propagating ~~reductins~~.		# Compact the parse table, eliminating and propagating reductions.
	# Show the stack and input states, as well as the parser actions, for the sequence '''xxzxx'''.		# Show the stack and input states, as well as the parser actions, for the sequence '''xxzxx'''.

Root at 20:23, 5 May 2008

2008-05-05T20:23:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 5 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Consider the following grammar.		Consider the following grammar.
	<text>		<text>
	A -> C x A \| Ïµ		A -> C x A \| Îµ
	B -> x C y \| x C		B -> x C y \| x C
	C -> x B x \| z		C -> x B x \| z

Root at 16:58, 5 May 2008

2008-05-05T16:58:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 5 May 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf Solution]		* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf Solution]

			[[category:Compilers]]
			[[category:IST]]

Root at 10:03, 5 May 2008

2008-05-05T10:03:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:03, 5 May 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:
	# Show the stack and input states, as well as the parser actions, for the sequence '''xxzxx'''.		# Show the stack and input states, as well as the parser actions, for the sequence '''xxzxx'''.

	* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf ~~LALR(1) Example 1~~ Solution]		* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf Solution]

Root: New page: Consider the following grammar. A -> C x A | ϵ B -> x C y | x C C -> x B x | z # Build the LALR(1) parser table. If conflicts exist, assume YACC's behavior. # Show the dif...

2008-05-05T08:51:45Z

New page: Consider the following grammar. <text> A -> C x A | ϵ B -> x C y | x C C -> x B x | z </text> # Build the LALR(1) parser table. If conflicts exist, assume YACC's behavior. # Show the dif...

New page

Consider the following grammar.
<text>
A -> C x A | Ïµ
B -> x C y | x C
C -> x B x | z
</text>

# Build the LALR(1) parser table. If conflicts exist, assume YACC's behavior.
# Show the differences to LR(0) and SLR(1) parsers.
# Compact the parse table, eliminating and propagating reductins.
# Show the stack and input states, as well as the parser actions, for the sequence '''xxzxx'''.

* [http://www.l2f.inesc-id.pt/~david/ist/docencia/compiladores/2007-2008/lalr-ex-1.pdf LALR(1) Example 1 Solution]