Top-Down Parsing/Exercise 3: Difference between revisions
From Wiki**3
< Top-Down Parsing
m (→Solution) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Something to keep in mind at all times: '''never eliminate the rules corresponding to the initial symbol''' | Something to keep in mind at all times: '''never eliminate the rules corresponding to the initial symbol''' | ||
There are two ways of handling the mutual recursion: either | There are two ways of handling the mutual recursion: either expanding F in G or G in F. | ||
== Expanding G in F == | == Expanding G in F == |
Revision as of 19:19, 16 April 2010
Problem
Consider the following grammar, where G is the initial symbol and {a,b,c,d,e} is the set of terminal symbols:
O -> a G -> F c | O c d | (eps) F -> G b | O c F e
- Examine the grammar and rewrite it so that an LL(1) predictive parser can be built for the corresponding language.
- Compute the FIRST and FOLLOW sets for all non-terminal symbols in the new grammar and build the parse table.
- Show the analysis table (stack, input, and actions) for the parsing process of the acbec input sequence.
Solution
Something to keep in mind at all times: never eliminate the rules corresponding to the initial symbol
There are two ways of handling the mutual recursion: either expanding F in G or G in F.
Expanding G in F
Initial grammar:
O -> a G -> F c | O c d | (eps) F -> G b | O c F e
Eliminating the singularity (O->a):
G -> F c | a c d | (eps) F -> G b | a c F e
Expanding G in F:
G -> F c | a c d | (eps) F -> F c b | a c d b | b | a c F e
Eliminate left recursion in F:
G -> F c | a c d | (eps) F -> a c d b F' | b F' | a c F e F' F' -> c b F' | (eps)
Factor F prefixes and expand it in G:
G -> a c F" c | b F' c | a c d | (eps) F -> a c F" | b F' F' -> c b F' | (eps) F" -> d b F' | F e F'
Note that we still have common prefixes to factor in G and a non-terminal left-corner in F. The next step will handle those cases:
G -> a c G' | b F' c | (eps) G' -> F" c | d F' -> c b F' | (eps) F" -> d b F' | a c F" e F' | b F' e F'
F was eliminated because it became unreachable from the start symbol. The grammar still has a non-terminal left corner in G', so we need to eliminate it.
G -> a c G' | b F' c | (eps) G' -> d b F' c | a c F" e F' c | b F' e F' c | d F' -> c b F' | (eps) F" -> d b F' | a c F" e F' | b F' e F'
Factoring prefixes in G', we get to the final version:
G -> a c G' | b F' c | (eps) G' -> d G" | a c F" e F' c | b F' e F' c G" -> b F' c | (eps) F' -> c b F' | (eps) F" -> d b F' | a c F" e F' | b F' e F'
Expanding F in G
Initial grammar:
O -> a G -> F c | O c d | (eps) F -> G b | O c F e
Eliminating the singularity (O->a):
G -> F c | a c d | (eps) F -> G b | a c F e
Expanding F in G:
G -> G b c | a c F e c | a c d | (eps) F -> G b | a c F e
Eliminating left recursion in G:
G -> a c F e c G' | a c d G' | G' G' -> b c G' | (eps) F -> G b | a c F e
Factoring G prefixes:
G -> a c G" | b c G' | (eps) G' -> b c G' | (eps) G" -> F e c G' | d G' F -> a c G" b | b c G' b | b | a c F e
Factoring F prefixes:
G -> a c G" | b c G' | (eps) G' -> b c G' | (eps) G" -> F e c G' | d G' F -> a c F' | b F" F' -> G" b | F e F" -> c G' b | (eps)
Eliminating non-terminal left corners (note that F becomes unreachable):
G -> a c G" | b c G' | (eps) G' -> b c G' | (eps) G" -> a c F' e c G' | b F" e c G' | d G' F' -> a c F' e c G' b | b F" e c G' b | d G' b | a c F' e | b F" e F" -> c G' b | (eps)
Factoring F' prefixes, we get to the final version:
G -> a c G" | b c G' | (eps) G' -> b c G' | (eps) G" -> a c F' e c G' | b F" e c G' | d G' F' -> a c F' e F" | b F" e F" F" -> c G' b | (eps)