LALR(1) Exercises: Difference between revisions
From Wiki**3
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
* [[Answers to LALR(1) Tests]] | * [[Answers to LALR(1) Tests]] | ||
[[category:Compiladores]] | |||
[[category:Ensino]] | [[category:Ensino]] | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 6 April 2015
Exercise 1
Consider the following grammar, where S is the initial symbol and { a, b } is the set of terminal symbols: <text> S -> G b b | a a b | b G a G -> a </text>
- Compute the set of LALR(1) states for the grammar. Build the corresponding LALR(1) parse table.
- Show the parsing process for input baaabb (including the actions/gotos and the input and stack states). In case of conflict, assume YACC's behavior.
- Is this an SLR(1) grammar? Why?
Exercise 2
Consider the following grammar, where E is the initial symbol and { [, ], ;, id } is the set of terminal symbols: <text> E -> [ E ; L ] | id L -> E | E ; L </text>
- Compute the set of LALR(1) states for the grammar. Build the corresponding LALR(1) parse table.
- Show the parsing process for input [id;id;id] (including the actions/gotos and the input and stack states). In case of conflict, assume YACC's behavior.
- Is this an LL(1) grammar? Why?
Exercise 3
Consider the following grammar, where S is the initial symbol and { e, i, x } is the set of terminal symbols: <text> S -> i S | i S e S | x </text>
- Compute the set of LALR(1) states for the grammar. Build the corresponding LALR(1) parse table.
- Compact the parse table, eliminating and propagating reductions.
- Show the parsing process for input ixixex (including the actions/gotos and the input and stack states). In case of conflict, assume YACC's behavior.
- Is this an SLR(1) grammar? Why?
Exercise 4 (test)
Consider the following grammar, where A is the initial symbol and { x, y, z } is the set of terminal symbols: <text> A -> B y y | z z x | x B x B -> z | ε </text>
- Compute the set of LALR(1) states for the grammar. Build the corresponding LALR(1) parse table.
- Compact the parse table, eliminating and propagating reductions.
- Show the parsing process for input xx (including the actions/gotos and the input and stack states). In case of conflict, assume YACC's behavior.
Exercise 5 (test)
Consider the following grammar, where A is the initial symbol and { x, y, z } is the set of terminal symbols: <text> A -> B x y | x y x | x B y B -> z | ε </text>
- Compute the set of LALR(1) states for the grammar. Build the corresponding LALR(1) parse table.
- Compact the parse table, eliminating and propagating reductions.
- Show the parsing process for input xzy (including the actions/gotos and the input and stack states). In case of conflict, assume YACC's behavior.
Exercise 6 (test)
Consider the following grammar, where A is the initial symbol and { x, y, z } is the set of terminal symbols: <text> A -> A B A x | A y | z B -> x | z B </text>
- Compute the set of LALR(1) states for the grammar. Build the corresponding LALR(1) parse table.
- Compact the parse table, eliminating and propagating reductions.
- Show the parsing process for input zzxzyx (including the actions/gotos and the input and stack states). In case of conflict, assume YACC's behavior.