Code Generation/Example 2: Difference between revisions
From Wiki**3
< Code Generation
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
* ld -o batata batata.o -lrts | * ld -o batata batata.o -lrts | ||
[[category: | [[category:Compiladores]] | ||
[[category: | [[category:Ensino]] |
Revision as of 14:29, 6 April 2015
The Original Code
Consider the following S9 function:
<c> string a = "batata"; int s9() -> 0 {
a!
} </c>
Postfix Code
The Postfix code for the above function is as follows:
<asm>
- --- declaring the string literal
RODATA ALIGN LABEL _L123 ;; automatic label STR "batata"
- --- declaring the global variable "a"
DATA ALIGN LABEL a ID _L123 ;; automatic label
- --- this is the main function (note that "s9" translates to RTS's "_main")
TEXT ALIGN GLOBL _main, FUNC LABEL _main ENTER 0
ADDRV a ;; ADDRV = ADDR+LOAD EXTRN prints CALL prints TRASH 4
INT 0 POP LEAVE RET </asm>
Compiling and Running
To test the first example, the S9 compilation process is as follows:
- s9 batata.s9
- yasm -felf batata.asm
- ld -o batata batata.o -lrts
To test the second program directly, pf2asm can be used:
- pf2asm batata.pf
- yasm -felf batata.asm
- ld -o batata batata.o -lrts