Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis/Exercise 8
From Wiki**3
< Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis
Compute the non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) by using Thompson's algorithm. Compute the minimal deterministic finite automaton (DFA).
The alphabet is Σ = { a, b }. Indicate the number of processing steps for the given input string.
- G = { a*, a*|b, a|b* }, input string = aababb
NFA
The following is the result of applying Thompson's algorithm. State 4 recognizes the first expression (token T1); state 12 recognizes token T2; and state 20 recognizes token T3.
<graph> digraph nfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s } rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 4 12 20 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
s -> 0
0 -> 1 1 -> 2 1 -> 4 2 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10] 3 -> 2 3 -> 4
0 -> 5 5 -> 6 5 -> 10 6 -> 7 6 -> 9 7 -> 8 [label="a",fontsize=10] 8 -> 7 8 -> 9 9 -> 12 10 -> 11 [label="b",fontsize=10] 11 -> 12
0 -> 13 13 -> 14 13 -> 16 14 -> 15 [label="a",fontsize=10] 15 -> 20 16 -> 17 16 -> 19 17 -> 18 [label="b",fontsize=10] 18 -> 17 18 -> 19 19 -> 20 fontsize=10
} </graph>
DFA
Determination table for the above NFA:
In | α∈Σ | move(In, α) | ε-closure(move(In, α)) | In+1 = ε-closure(move(In, α)) |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | - | 0 | 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20 | 0 (T1) |
0 | a | 3, 8, 15 | 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, 20 | 1 (T1) |
0 | b | 11, 18 | 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20 | 2 (T2) |
1 | a | 3, 8 | 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12 | 3 (T1) |
1 | b | - | - | - |
2 | a | - | - | - |
2 | b | 18 | 17, 18, 19, 20 | 4 (T3) |
3 | a | 3, 8 | 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12 | 3 (T1) |
3 | b | - | - | - |
4 | a | - | - | - |
4 | b | 18 | 17, 18, 19, 20 | 4 (T3) |
Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:
<graph> digraph dfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s } rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 1 2 3 4 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; s -> 0 0 -> 1 [label="a",fontsize=10] 0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10] 1 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10] 2 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10] 3 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10] 4 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10] fontsize=10
} </graph>
The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize.
<graph> digraph mintree {
node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.3,fontsize=10] "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{}" [label="NF",fontsize=10] "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " [label=" F",fontsize=10] "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{0, 1, 3}" [label=" T1",fontsize=10] "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{2}" [label=" T2",fontsize=10] "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{4}" [label=" T3",fontsize=10] "{0, 1, 3}" -> "{0}" [label=" b",fontsize=10] "{0, 1, 3}" -> "{1,3}" //[label=" b",fontsize=10] fontsize=10 //label="Minimization tree"
} </graph>
The tree expansion for non-splitting sets has been omitted for simplicity ("a" transitions for super-state {0, 1, 3}, and "a" and "b" transitions for super-state {1,3}).
Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is as follows. Note that states 2 and 4 cannot be the same since they recognize different tokens.
<graph> digraph mindfa {
{ node [shape=circle style=invis] s } rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 13 2 4 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; s -> 0 0 -> 13 [label="a",fontsize=10] 0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10] 13 -> 13 [label="a",fontsize=10] 2 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10] 4 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10] fontsize=10
} </graph>
Input Analysis
In | Input | In+1 / Token |
---|---|---|
0 | aababb$ | 13 |
13 | ababb$ | 13 |
13 | babb$ | T1 (aa) |
0 | babb$ | 2 |
2 | abb$ | T2 (b) |
0 | abb$ | 13 |
13 | bb$ | T1 (a) |
0 | bb$ | 2 |
2 | b$ | 4 |
4 | $ | T3 (bb) |
The input string aababb is, after 10 steps, split into three tokens: T1 (corresponding to lexeme aa), T2 (b), T1 (a), and T3 (bb).