Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis/Exercise 8

From Wiki**3

< Theoretical Aspects of Lexical Analysis
Revision as of 14:39, 6 April 2015 by Root (talk | contribs)

Compute the non-deterministic finite automaton (NFA) by using Thompson's algorithm. Compute the minimal deterministic finite automaton (DFA).
The alphabet is Σ = { a, b }. Indicate the number of processing steps for the given input string.

  • G = { a*, a*|b, a|b* }, input string = aababb

NFA

The following is the result of applying Thompson's algorithm. State 4 recognizes the first expression (token T1); state 12 recognizes token T2; and state 20 recognizes token T3.

<graph> digraph nfa {

    { node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
 rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 4 12 20
 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
 s -> 0
 0 -> 1 
 1 -> 2
 1 -> 4
 2 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 3 -> 2
 3 -> 4
 0 -> 5
 5 -> 6
 5 -> 10
 6 -> 7
 6 -> 9
 7 -> 8 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 8 -> 7
 8 -> 9
 9 -> 12
 10 -> 11 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 11 -> 12
 0 -> 13
 13 -> 14
 13 -> 16
 14 -> 15 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 15 -> 20
 16 -> 17
 16 -> 19
 17 -> 18 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 18 -> 17
 18 -> 19
 19 -> 20
 fontsize=10

} </graph>

DFA

Determination table for the above NFA:

In α∈Σ move(In, α) ε-closure(move(In, α)) In+1 = ε-closure(move(In, α))
- - 0 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20 0 (T1)
0 a 3, 8, 15 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, 20 1 (T1)
0 b 11, 18 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20 2 (T2)
1 a 3, 8 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12 3 (T1)
1 b - - -
2 a - - -
2 b 18 17, 18, 19, 20 4 (T3)
3 a 3, 8 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12 3 (T1)
3 b - - -
4 a - - -
4 b 18 17, 18, 19, 20 4 (T3)

Graphically, the DFA is represented as follows:

<graph> digraph dfa {

    { node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
 rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 1 2 3 4
 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
 s -> 0
 0 -> 1 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 1 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 2 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 3 -> 3 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 4 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 fontsize=10

} </graph>

The minimization tree is as follows. Note that before considering transition behavior, states are split according to the token they recognize.

<graph> digraph mintree {

 node [shape=none,fixedsize=true,width=0.3,fontsize=10]
 "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{}" [label="NF",fontsize=10]
 "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4}" -> "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " [label="  F",fontsize=10]
 "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{0, 1, 3}" [label="  T1",fontsize=10]
 "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{2}" [label="  T2",fontsize=10]
 "{0, 1, 2, 3, 4} " -> "{4}" [label="  T3",fontsize=10]
 "{0, 1, 3}" -> "{0}" [label="  b",fontsize=10]
 "{0, 1, 3}" -> "{1,3}" //[label="  b",fontsize=10]
 fontsize=10
 //label="Minimization tree"

} </graph>

The tree expansion for non-splitting sets has been omitted for simplicity ("a" transitions for super-state {0, 1, 3}, and "a" and "b" transitions for super-state {1,3}).

Given the minimization tree, the final minimal DFA is as follows. Note that states 2 and 4 cannot be the same since they recognize different tokens.

<graph> digraph mindfa {

    { node [shape=circle style=invis] s }
 rankdir=LR; ratio=0.5
 node [shape=doublecircle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10]; 0 13 2 4
 node [shape=circle,fixedsize=true,width=0.2,fontsize=10];
 s -> 0
 0 -> 13 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 0 -> 2 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 13 -> 13 [label="a",fontsize=10]
 2 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 4 -> 4 [label="b",fontsize=10]
 fontsize=10

} </graph>

Input Analysis

In Input In+1 / Token
0 aababb$ 13
13 ababb$ 13
13 babb$ T1 (aa)
0 babb$ 2
2 abb$ T2 (b)
0 abb$ 13
13 bb$ T1 (a)
0 bb$ 2
2 b$ 4
4 $ T3 (bb)

The input string aababb is, after 10 steps, split into three tokens: T1 (corresponding to lexeme aa), T2 (b), T1 (a), and T3 (bb).